Simulate
Check the claim with numbers
Lesson 2.1.3 found that heads for 3 as grows, missing it by . Take it as a sequence, for whole numbers . Lesson 1.5.1 said what means: for every tolerance, from some term on, every term is that close to 3.
The cell tests exactly that. For three tolerances it finds the last term outside the band, checking 20,000 terms with exact fractions.
The last term outside is for 0.1, 498 for 0.01 and 4998 for 0.001. Each is the where the miss equals the tolerance. A smaller tolerance needs a later start, but some start always seems to work.
A sequence with no limit fails the test. The terms of jump between and 1 for ever (lesson 1.5.1).
Take the tolerance 0.5. For every odd term stays outside the band, for every even one, and for all of them. No can work: the band is 1 wide, and the terms are 2 apart.
Conjecture
Three tolerances worked, each from some term on. A proof must handle every tolerance, however small, with a rule that names the starting term.
The definition
Lesson 1.5.1 described a limit in words. The precise version names the tolerance (the Greek letter epsilon) and the starting term .
Rule: Limit of a sequence
says that lies strictly between and (lesson 0.3.3). The number may depend on , and usually does.
Read it as a game, in which a challenger names a tolerance . You must answer with a whole number such that every term after the -th is within of . The limit is if you can always answer.
The order matters: comes first, and is chosen after it. Stage PG1 practised reading statements of this shape.
The simulation found the smallest answers, 48, 498 and 4998. Any larger works too, since the terms after it are among those already checked. So a proof may pick a convenient , not the smallest one.
Writing an ε–N proof
First comes scratch work, which is not part of the proof. Work out the distance , and find which make it less than . For our sequence, , and when .
Then write the proof. Start from "let ", name in terms of , and show that every works. Here any whole number will do: it is a little larger than needed, and simpler.
Such an exists for every , because some whole number is larger than any given real number. This is the Archimedean property; lesson PG4.4 proves it from the completeness of the real numbers.
Try it
The cell takes to be the smallest whole number at least , which math.ceil computes. For each tolerance it then checks the next 10,000 terms after the -th.
All three print True, with , 500 and 5000.
Format 1
Reorder the steps
Here is the ε–N proof of the conjecture, with its lines shuffled. Put them in order with the arrows, or drag a line by its handle.
- For this , .
- By the Archimedean property, choose a whole number with .
- So for every . As was arbitrary, .
- Now take any whole number .
- Since , this is less than .
- Let be given.
Bound, do not solve
Solving exactly can be hard. It is enough to find a simpler expression that is larger than the distance and still tends to 0.
Take , which tends to 1. Making its distance from 1 less than exactly means solving a quadratic inequality. Instead, compare the distance with .
Try it
The distance stays below : 0.081818 against 0.1 at , and 0.000998 against 0.001 at . At it is 0, since .
With tolerance 0.001 the last term outside the band is . The bound asks for , a little later, and that is allowed.
Format 2
Fill the gap
The proof that , with its key steps left out. Type each missing piece in , or as a number, then check.
For every , . Its top is at least 0 and its bottom is positive, so this is also the distance .
Replace the top by the bigger , and the bottom by the smaller . That gives , for every .
Now let , and choose a whole number . For every , . So .
For example, with this proof takes . The cell found that 997 would do, but a larger is fine.
How to type answers
- Powers with
^, brackets round a power that is a sum:r^k,r^(k+1). - Fractions with
/and brackets:(1-r)/(1+r). Multiply with*or side by side:2k+1. - Press Enter in any box to check them all.
Format 3
Find the error
A proof of a false claim. One line claims more than the lines before it have shown. Select it.
Summary card
- means: for every there is a whole number with for every . may depend on .
- To prove a limit, find from in scratch work. The proof names and checks every .
- Any larger works too, so bound the distance by something simpler, such as .
- Some whole number exceeds any real number (the Archimedean property, lesson PG4.4), so the always exists.
- A sequence has no limit if one defeats every : for , does.