Simulate
Check the claim with numbers
Lesson 1.4.1 found its exponent rules by counting factors in examples. Before proving them, test three of them with exact whole numbers. The cell tries every base and from to , zero included, and exponents , from 1 to 6.
All 1,764 checks pass. Rules that look similar do not. With , , and :
A product of powers adds the exponents (32, not 64), and a power of a power multiplies them (64, not 32). A power of a sum is not the sum of the powers: 25 against 13.
Lesson 1.4.1 also gave and . The cell below builds each power from those definitions alone, by repeated multiplication, and tests the quotient rule .
No failures in 147 cases, for exponents from to . A base of 0 breaks the rule, because it divides by zero.
Conjecture
For all numbers and and whole numbers ,
If , then with and , also .
All 1,764 checks and all 147 cases pass. The rules are about every number and every whole number and , so they still need a proof.
Proof from a definition
Every rule here follows from one definition. A proof uses it in both directions: to unpack a power into factors, and to pack factors back into a power.
Rule: A whole-number power
The base can be any number. The exponent counts the factors.
The proofs also use two facts about multiplication. Brackets in a product can be moved, so a long product needs none. Factors can be swapped, so they can be put in any order.
Counting factors is a direct proof (lesson PG2.1). Stage PG3 makes "and so on" in a product fully formal, with induction.
Format 1
Reorder the steps
Here is the proof of the product rule , with its lines shuffled. Put them in order.
- Brackets in a product can be moved, so this is a single product of factors of .
- So is a product of factors of , followed by more.
- By the definition again, that product is .
- Let be a number and whole numbers. By the definition, is a product of factors, each equal to .
- Likewise, is a product of factors, each equal to .
The same counting proves the next two rules. A power of a power is copies of , and each copy is factors of :
The middle step is the product rule, used once for each copy after the first. A power of a product is copies of , and swapping factors puts the 's first:
Format 2
Fill the gap
The quotient rule, in three cases. Fill each gap as you would a quick answer, such as m+n or 1/a^2, then check.
Let and let be whole numbers. A power is a product of nonzero numbers, so and dividing by it is allowed.
Case . Since , the product rule gives with . Dividing both sides by leaves .
Case . Then is a number divided by itself, which is . The rule asks for , and the definition makes the two agree.
Case . The product rule gives with , so . The rule asks for with . The definition makes the two agree.
The three cases cover every pair , , so the quotient rule holds for all whole . The definitions of and are not arbitrary: they are the only values that keep the rule true.
How to type answers
- Powers with
^, brackets round a power that is a sum:r^k,r^(k+1). - Fractions with
/and brackets:(1-r)/(1+r). Multiply with*or side by side:2k+1. - Press Enter in any box to check them all.
Format 3
Find the error
This proof claims that . The simulation found but , so one line must be wrong. Select it, then say why.
Summary card
- A whole-number power is a product of factors of . Each rule is proved by unpacking powers into factors and packing them back.
- Product rule: . Power of a power: . Power of a product: .
- For , the quotient rule holds in all three cases, , and . That forces and .
- Factors can be regrouped; terms of a sum cannot. in general.